rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed doi:10.1136/adc.2006.103929

Cardiorespiratory effects of changes in end expiratory pressure in ventilated newborns

  1. Koert A de Waal (k.a.dewaal{at}amc.uva.nl)
  1. Academic Medical Centre, Netherlands
    1. Nick Evans (nevans{at}med.usyd.edu.au)
    1. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Australia
      1. David A Osborn (david.osborn{at}email.cs.nsw.gov.au)
      1. Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
        1. Martin Kluckow (mkluckow{at}med.usyd.edu.au)
        1. University of Sydney, Australia
          • Published Online First 25 April 2007

          Abstract

          Background:Positive pressure ventilation in premature infants can improve oxygenation, but may also diminish cerebral blood flow and cardiac output. Low brain and upper body flow (superior vena cava flow, SVC) increases the risk of intraventricular haemorrhage, with previous research showing that higher mean airway pressure is associated with low SVC flow. It is not known whether this is a direct effect of positive pressure ventilation or a reflection of severity of lung disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ventilated newborns could be increased without causing clinically relevant cardiorespiratory changes.

          Methods:Ventilated newborns were studied before and 10 minutes after increasing PEEP from 5 to 8 cmH2O, then again when returned to baseline. Simultaneous echocardiographic and respiratory function measurements were collected during the intervention.

          Results:Fifty infants were studied. Overall, increased PEEP was associated with a non-significant difference in mean SVC flow of -5 ml/kg/min (95%CI -12 to 3) but a significant reduction in right ventricular output of 17 ml/kg/min (95%CI 5 to 28). There was a non-significant increase in lung compliance of (median difference 0.02 ml/cmH2O/kg; p 0.093) and a significant decrease in lung resistance of 18 cmH2O/L/s (95%CI 10 to 26). There was a positive association between % change in lung compliance and % change in SVC flow when corrected for paCO2 changes (regression coefficient 0.4 % (95%CI 0.2 to 0.6)).

          Conclusion:A short-term increase in PEEP does not result in a significant change in systemic blood flow, although 36% of infants had clinically important changes in flow (+/-25%).The intervention can improve dynamic lung function, especially airway resistance. Improvements in compliance tend to be associated with improvements in blood flow.

          This Article

          1. All Versions of this Article:
            1. adc.2006.103929v1
            2. 92/6/F444 most recent

          Services

          1. Request permissions

          Responses

          1. Submit a response
          2. No responses published

          Social bookmarking

          Latest from Education & Practice

          Latest from Education & Practice

          Register for free content

          Free sample
          This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
          View free sample issue >>

          Free archive
          The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
          Register to access the free archive >>

          Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

        1. Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

          Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs