rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed doi:10.1136/adc.2007.121053

Attempt to improve transcutaneous bilirubinometry: a double blinded study Medick BiliMed versus Respironics BiliCheck

  1. Daniele De Luca (dm.deluca{at}fastwebnet.it)
  1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy
    1. Enrico Zecca (enrizecca{at}rm.unicatt.it)
    1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart,, Italy
      1. Mirta Corsello
      1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart,, Italy
        1. Eloisa Tiberi
        1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart,, Italy
          1. Carla Semeraro
          1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart,, Italy
            1. Costantino Romagnoli (cromagnoli{at}rm.unicatt.it)
            1. Catholic University of the Sacred Heart,, Italy
              • Published Online First 15 November 2007

              Abstract

              Objectives: To compare the accuracy of a new transcutaneous bilirubinometer (BiliMed® Medick SA, Paris, France) with BiliCheckTM (Respironics, Marietta, GA- USA), a widely available instrument, and with total serum bilirubin measurement.

              Design: We conducted a prospective double blinded study comparing two devices. 686 healthy newborns needing their bilirubin measured were enrolled over a 4 month-period. Serum and transcutaneous bilirubin measurements were taken with both devices within 15 minutes. The order of use of the instruments was randomized.

              Setting: Well-baby nursery ward in a University Hospital, tertiary referral centre.

              Results: The linear regression analysis showed a better correlation between BiliCheckTM and serum bilirubin (r = 0.75) than between BiliMed® and serum bilirubin (r = 0.45). BiliCheckTM variability (± 2 S.D. of the mean bias from serum bilirubin) was within -5.1/+3.7 mg/dl, while BiliMed® variability was within -5.7/+7.1 mg/dl. The ROC analysis (for serum bilirubin levels > 12 mg/dl or > 14 mg/dl) showed significantly higher areas under the curve for BiliCheckTM than those for BiliMed® ( p < 0.0001).

              Conclusions: Despite the potential practical advantages of BiliMed® , the reduced diagnostic accuracy in comparison to BiliCheckTM does not justify its use in clinical practice.

              This Article

              1. All Versions of this Article:
                1. adc.2007.121053v1
                2. 93/2/F135 most recent

              Services

              1. Request permissions

              Responses

              1. Submit a response
              2. No responses published

              Social bookmarking

              Latest from Education & Practice

              Latest from Education & Practice

              Register for free content

              Free sample
              This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
              View free sample issue >>

              Free archive
              The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
              Register to access the free archive >>

              Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

            1. Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

              Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs